BOARD FOR CORREST!
1)
This is in reference to your application for
the provisions of 1
naval record pursuant to
A three-member panel of the Board for ¢
Records, sitting in executive se
application on 25 November 2013.
injustice were reviewed in accor
regulations and procedures appii
Board. Documentary material
of your application, together wi
support thereof, your naval reco
regulations and policies.
The Board al
your record f
years ago.
for a correction ©
years after the discovery ©
within the prescribed t
where the Board finds t
do so. Although you neglec
inordinately
provided no
alleged error corrected earlier,
review your case.
Navy enlisted advancements ar
which considers a vari
candidate’s overall performan
proficiency, Pe
fitness, time in service,
decorations, and the like.
advanced, the candidate must ha
of their commanding officer. P
compete with each other for a 1
ce,
consi
bree years may be exc
hat it is in the inte
ted to assert your claim for an
long period of time w
evidence as to why you
ety of perf
rformance of duty,
time in gra
Before any candidate may be
ve the favorable recommendati
ersonnel within each rating
imited number of promotion
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
ON OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 §. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No.NRO1551-13
26 November 2013
correction of your
0 USC 1552.
orrection of Naval
ssion, considered your
Your allegations of error and
dance with administrative
cable to the proceedings of this
idered by. the Board consisted
th all material submitted in
rd and applicable statutes,
so notes that you have applied for a correction to
or an error that allege
Under the rules governing this B
f a naval recor
f£ the alleged error.
dly occurred more than 60
oard, an application
d must be made within three
Failure to file
used only in cases
rests of justice to
jthout justification and you
dia not seek to have the
the Board still decided to
e based on a competitive system
ormance factors including a
technical knowledge, military
conduct, education, physical
de, experience, awards,
on
(job)
Docket No.NRO1551-13
vacancies. Only those qualified candidates for whom vacancies
exist are advanced. In such cases, service record entries are
made (often accompanied by a short ceremony and delivery of a
certificate memorializing the advancement) which actually
effects the advancement.
A review of your naval record reveals that you signed a Report
@of~Transfer or Disgharge (DD Form 214) which indicates that you
were discharged henorably in the rank of Slc/Seaman First Class.
There is no evidence that you were or should have been advanced
beyond that rank prior to your discharge.
‘Therefore, after careful and conscientious consideration of the
entire record, the Board determined that there is insufficient
evidence of an error or injustice that would warrant any relief.
Based on the circumstances described above, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
idan
W. DEAN P E
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6358 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 December 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5508 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 December 2013. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4874 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2316-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2013. Before any candidate may be advanced, the candidate must have the favorable recommendation of their commanding officer. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4919-13
Board for. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5028-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2013. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5664-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your- application on 26 August 2013. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. those qualified candidates for whom vacancies exist are Docket No.NRO05664-13 advanced.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6939 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 November 2013. Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged error. The absence of a service record showing’ the effective date of advancement indicates that a candidate was not actually advanced in the active duty component.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6070-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2013. It is possible, even common, for a candidate to receive 4 passing score on an advancement exam and/or to complete minimum required advancement courses, but still not be actually advanced. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9263 13
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval - Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2014. Only those qualified candidates for whom vacancies exist are advanced. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.